Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Golf Bag Holder For Motorcycles

Passato...



revealed Bluehenge Sheffield University archaeologists led by Mike Parker Pearson have revealed the existence of a prehistoric site, dubbed Bluehenge, just 2 miles from Stonehenge. All that remains are 27 great holes, inside which were found fragments of bluestone, the same as those of Stonehenge. The hypothesis is that the two circles coexisted for hundreds of years, until Bluehenge stones were reused for one of the extensions made at Stonehenge. The new circle of stones was unearthed in secret this summer. Big 18 meters, if they estimated the construction to 5000 years ago, more or less the age of Stonehenge, which also appears to have a miniature version. The rocks were mined in the hills of Preseli, in the county of Pembrokeshire (Wales), and transported to the River Avon in Wiltshire. Bluehenge lies at the very end of the path ritual linking Stonehenge to the River Avon. The details of the discovery will be published in February.
Source: The
fattostorico
... and this: Reproduced
the Shroud

For years now, and more precisely from the judgments of the Oxford laboratory, Tucson, Zurich 1988, the debate on the authenticity of Shroud remains on, with constant twists, denials, doubts, discoveries and so on. Today on the news that the Republic Cicap engineers, led by Dr. Garlaschelli (Former author of "The Trial of the Shroud"), were able to reproduce on a sheet what the Shroud, and many believe they deemed not made by human hands, why do not you.
Una ricostruzione di Bluehenge (dailymail.co.uk)
The meticulous work of reconstruction, of course, did not provide for the use of modern technology, but it was done with techniques and materials in use in 1300, and the purpose of this research was intended to demonstrate that it was possible the flourishing of false Crafts relics of the period, producing an image as the unlikely and the alleged burial cloth of Christ.

This is yet another step that mounts the claims of the Shroud. How

argues Garlaschelli:

L'implausibilità della Sindone, la cui prossima ostensione avverrà nel 2010, è stata già affermata da molti, e per varie ragioni: una tessitura mai usata nel primo secolo, il modo in cui sarebbe dovuto essere avvolto il cadavere contrario agli usi ebraici del tempo, la resa chiaramente artistica dei capelli, delle colature di sangue, degli arti, la mancanza delle defomazioni geometriche che ci aspetteremmo da un'impronta lasciata da un corpo umano su un telo avvolto. E soprattutto il fatto che la Sindone comparve in Francia solo verso il 1357.

Come è avvenuto l'esperimento:

Seguendo le teorie di Joe Nickell , si è provveduto a far tessere un telo dalle esatte caratteristiche of the Shroud, by weight, size and texture, done that "aged" by heating to 215 degrees Celsius for three hours and then washing it with water only. Then the cloth was lying on a volunteer and with a swab of dirtied reddish ocher were found, rubbing, only the parts in relief. He then proceeded to finish the hand image after lying on a flat surface of the fabric. For the face, in order to avoid distortions was done by a bas relief a plaster cast.

Tempera liquid instead was used to simulate the blows of the lash and the bloodstains. So we proceeded to grow old even in an artificial pigment.

The result is a soft cloth on a yellowed, not fluorescent under ultraviolet light, whose negative and similar to the Shroud, and if the computer shows also developed three-dimensional properties. As the cloth is called the Shroud in 1300. [sindone_intera[4].jpg] Source:
ilpensatoio


Posted by admin at 1:37 AM

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)